🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has announced it is pursuing compensation totaling $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This legal step constitutes a clear response by the Kremlin against plans to use frozen Russian state assets to support Ukraine.

The Financial Lawsuit

According to accounts in local news outlets, the monetary authority filed a lawsuit last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This amount is equivalent to the stated $230 billion demand.

European Union officials are set to decide later this week regarding a proposal to leverage around €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. The proposal involves granting Ukraine with a large loan to fund its military and economic stability.

Most of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution serves as the main custodian for the Kremlin's immobilised sovereign wealth.

Divergent Legal Views

EU officials have argued that their plan is on solid legal ground. They argue rests on the principle that ownership of the state assets still belongs to Russia, even though it was immobilized in European countries shortly after the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has labeled any utilization of the funds as theft. Authorities have threatened retaliatory measures, such as confiscating EU private investors' holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has assumed a prominent role in peace negotiations, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its assets. He added that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the plan.

Wider Implications

In comments seen as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the proposal as "a severe assault on the right to ownership and the global financial system established by the United States."

The clearing house declined to comment on the new lawsuit. The institution has previously stated it is facing more than 100 lawsuits in Russian courts.

Enforcement Challenges

Although judges in EU countries are unlikely to enforce judgments from Russian tribunals, experts expect Moscow to pursue implementation in countries with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities could try to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly nations, if relevant assets can be located," stated a legal expert from an international firm.

European Safeguards

EU officials indicated they are working on measures to deter other countries from assisting any Russian lawsuits against European entities. They are also designing protections to shield EU member states with assets in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

Under the detailed scheme, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would remain untouched.

Ukraine would only be required to return the loan in the event that Russia consented to pay compensation for the vast damage inflicted during the nearly four-year war.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an different approach for financing Ukraine. This entails common EU borrowing to fund a loan, backed by unused funds within the EU budget.

This alternative move, nevertheless, requires full agreement among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has already expressed its opposition.

Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, described the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest option" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it is not drawn from our public funds, which is equally important," she remarked. "Furthermore, it delivers a clear message that when you cause all this destruction to another nation, you have to pay for the rebuilding."